People, you must wake up. We are only days away from possibly electing a Marxist to the Presidency of the United States. Read that sentence again. It isn't an exaggeration, nor is it a racist statement. It is absolutely the truth.
Barak Hussein Obama is an enigma wrapped in a mystery...unless you take the time and effort to do a little digging.
BHO has been indoctrinated in the Socialist Marxist mindset since his earliest days. From his Marxist (admittedly) leaning mother, to the Saul Alinskey inspired community organizing to something that is just now coming to light...namely his participation and membership in the
New Party.
The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, with a vision based on the teachings of Eugene V. Debs, a 5 time Socialist Party Presidential nominee at the turn of the century. It's goal was to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States in to Socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left.
It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of "fusion" failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling. But dissolving the party didn't stop the membership, including Barack Obama, from continuing to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success.
Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let's call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama's New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.
The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. "After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century .... In 1996, it helped Chicago's Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district .... The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued."Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.;
And for all you people that think it's impossible for any "significant harm" to come to this country in 4 short years (or God forbid...8!), here's a little food for thought:
Adolf Hitler was democratically elected Germany's Reich Chancellor in 1934 and by 1939 had
supressed free speech, taken over the courts, crushed all dissent and invaded Poland, starting WWII.
Just think what BHO could do in 4 years with a majority Left Liberal Congress!
Barak Hussein Obama is an enigma wrapped in a mystery...unless you take the time and effort to do a little digging.
BHO has been indoctrinated in the Socialist Marxist mindset since his earliest days. From his Marxist (admittedly) leaning mother, to the Saul Alinskey inspired community organizing to something that is just now coming to light...namely his participation and membership in the
New Party.
The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, with a vision based on the teachings of Eugene V. Debs, a 5 time Socialist Party Presidential nominee at the turn of the century. It's goal was to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States in to Socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left.
It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of "fusion" failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling. But dissolving the party didn't stop the membership, including Barack Obama, from continuing to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success.
Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate -- let's call him Barack Obama -- received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama's New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.
The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. "After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century .... In 1996, it helped Chicago's Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district .... The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued."Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.;
And for all you people that think it's impossible for any "significant harm" to come to this country in 4 short years (or God forbid...8!), here's a little food for thought:
Adolf Hitler was democratically elected Germany's Reich Chancellor in 1934 and by 1939 had
supressed free speech, taken over the courts, crushed all dissent and invaded Poland, starting WWII.
Just think what BHO could do in 4 years with a majority Left Liberal Congress!
Here are some interesting links:http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng47.html
